Aimpoint
May 14th, 2012 / Author: admin4/21/2012 9:13:06 PM EDT I wish I had a nickle for every time I saw a thread exactly like this one. Aimpoint mkboog<br>
Gun AccessoriesMay 10th, 2012 / Author: admin5/9/2005 2:54:16 AM I do not want to step on any toes BUT there are 50 Stated in this Great Union. You should not forget that and we all need to work together and ship without worry to all States. I have been battling all of those businesses like Ammoman, that refuse to conduct interstate business. Just understand that thinking like yours is costing be and others a lot of cash. By the was we up here in Alaska are still part of the CONUS, we are all part of this big rock called North America yekimak M14 Scope MountsMay 8th, 2012 / Author: adminPM I’ve seen one M14 Scope Mounts NM from the state association at matches, but its been a few years. I suppose there may still be some out there but it would take better connections with the state association than what I have to get my hands on one. As far as real M14 Scope Mounts‘s on the commercial market, hmm, no. (A) its class 3, (B) probably stolen government property, and (c) costs way more than anyone would want to spend.
‘Video may not be enough to convict officer’May 3rd, 2012 / Author: admin‘Video may not be enough to convict officer’ Mesa TacticalApril 24th, 2012 / Author: adminReceived this from a Threeper I trust implicitlyApril 24th, 2012 / Author: adminReceived this from a Threeper I trust implicitly regarding LaRue Tactical quality control problems and service issues. He included a copy of a series of emails back and forth beginning in December of last year. Here’s his latest to me:
My son has been collecting the components to build himself a 7.62 NATO sniper platform on an Armalite receiver much like the one pictured. He was thinking, if memory serves me correctly, of getting a LaRue Tactical mount like the one pictured. I will discourage him from doing so. –
My son has been collecting the components to build himself a 7.62 NATO sniper platform on an Armalite receiver much like the one pictured. He was thinking, if memory serves me correctly, of getting a LaRue Tactical mount like the one pictured. I will discourage him from doing so. March 5th, 2012 / Author: adminDidn’t handle it but it did look pretty good- Thought at first he had a FAMAS! “I pledge allegiance to the ideal left us by men wiser than I, having the forethought to gift their children with the power of being free.” Joined: Aug 2007 Offline “I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass…and I’m all out of bubble gum.” -Nada – March 4th, 2012 / Author: admin Other than that – I’m very thankful Trijicon made this scope. It’s a perfect blend of precision and speed. It’s eye relief, size, and FOV make for a fast & compact general purpose optic. For 10-300 yard shooting, this is in my opinion, the perfect ACOG. For shooting under 10 yards, it seems like it’d serve me well – I may toss some Bulter Creek Flip Caps on this one for an occluded option since the construction will allow for it! Plus, the caps will make the Trijicon ACOG Scope Coat a thing of the past. Something always kept me from hanging onto an ACOG. I feel the TA33R8 was made just for me! I do have hearing protection loss from my military service in artillery long before they knew that decibels caused permanent hearing protection loss. I had the RX01 w/12 MOA triangle on my Colt R0635 subgun and it was a perfect match for it and myself. Of course it was on the foward handle mount like above. I had it for about 12yrs and it was as bright as the day I got it. I traded it off to a new EOTech 512. I kept the 512 on my M4 flattop for years and now it lives on my MSAR STG556. Never a problem with the 512 and I have had it for 10yrs now. The only think I didn’t like about the Trijicon was the washout. I had to keep the filter on it all of the time. Other than that it was a kick ass little sight. Via AR15.Com Mobile In loving memory of: Staff Sgt. Delmar White Army National Guard, Kentucky Battery B, 2nd Batallion,138th Field Artillery KIA: September 2, 2007, in Iraq by a roadside bomb Mccray Oct 2009 USA LA, USA Online Posts: 1421 : 0-0-0 : 6/17/2011 2:08:29 T : 6/17/2011 2:14:31 T by Mccray] I have run the gambit from EOTech 516 to Burris XTR 1-4X ,then to an Aimpoint CompM2, then back to an EOTech, What EOTech sight models are compatible with this mount? zegermanznew Sep 2010 USA CT, USA 39 : 0-0-0 : Today 4:03:39 I wrote EOTech and RRA with the same question. Team Atlanta aims to be first repeat Laptop- Now all bitching aside, it is a neat rifle and I will probably spend the $$$ and get it right, both trigger and a lower scope mount. That said, say I had bought a good M1A today,(as in all GI parts), added scope mounts and smith work to make it function properly, I could easily have close to 3 FAL’s! www.brownells.com/aspx/NS/store/ProductDetail.aspx?p=24532&title=SHOTGUN%20BIG%20DOT%20TRITIUM%20FRONT%20SIGHT knightvision 5/27/2008 11:19:20 PM sorry, didnt come back to the post to see this. but looking at that it still looks like it would be too low to get down on quickly. either way, doesnt look like it would solve the issue i am having. F22_RaptoR 5/28/2008 3:50:02 AM I think the Mesa stock tube adaptor was made for using Ghost ring and other raised sights. Unless you have a higher cheek bone (like me) then using the bead may be unpossible, unfortunatly. I dont have one of these FYI. Gungho_1989 5/28/2008 9:23:49 AM I would look at a set of ghost rings again maybe they will fit the bill. I dont believe the XS sights would cure the problem though. knightvision 7/21/2008 9:24:01 PM havent been back here in awhile. im actually gonna try a speedfeed stock to see how i like that. im hoping someone wants to switch from the speedfeed to Mesa Tactical adapter so i listed it up for trade. MAX100 7/21/2008 10:19:47 PM I had the same problem with the Mesa Low tube stock adapter. It didn’t work well with either bead sight or with receiver mounted GRS. The recoil was brutal also so I sold it. I now have a Arms Tech stock adapter that has enough stock drop for both and I am very pleased. Recoil with it is the same as a regular stock. The Mesa low tube stock adapter is well made and looks nice but it doesn’t work it is not a good product. GC knightvision 7/21/2008 10:29:27 PM hmmm, i like the idea of the product so maybe i will check the arms tech adapter. i would be curious to see the products side by side. ETA: just checked the product. i think i may try that adapter. MAX100 7/21/2008 10:50:37 PM Here is the Arms Tech on one of my many shotguns. I reinforce the inside with a large washer that I took down the diameter. The large washer gives good metal to metal contact with the screw and lock washer. I used a larger washer in the pistol grip also. The CAA stock saddle gives a good cheek weld. The Tapco SAW grips has enough storage to fit two rounds. I have a SOG Viking rubber pad on the stock which is excellent quality for the money. The shotgun is a Norinco 982 with GRS. The AT adapter has held up well with no problems after about 1000 rounds. It is tough and well made. Didn’t handle it but it did look pretty good- Thought at first he had a FAMAS! “I pledge allegiance to the ideal left us by men wiser than I, having the forethought to gift their children with the power of being free.” Joined: Aug 2007 Offline “I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass…and I’m all out of bubble gum.” -Nada |
|
